Considerations for an information audit
Jinfo Blog
12th June 2012
Abstract
There is no standardised model for an information audit. However components will generally include planning, surveying, inventorying existing resources, performing a gap analysis, valuing existing resources, and outlining recommendations. Every information audit will involve a number of decision points and the direction chosen can ultimately affect the outcome.
Item
While the phrase "information audit" has risen and fallen in popularity, the need has remained steady if not grown. Most enterprises can benefit from an information audit, looking closely at how workers acquire, store, locate, share and use information. Done well, the process will identify opportunities to increase information access, save time, save money or some combination of the three.
There is no standard model for an information audit. Components will generally include planning, surveying, inventorying existing resources, performing a gap analysis, valuing existing resources, and outlining recommendations. Every information audit will involve a number of decision points, and the direction chosen can ultimately affect the outcome.
One such decision will centre on who should actually conduct the audit. Librarians and information professionals are particularly well-suited to the task and should consider offering this as a valuable service to their organisation either directly or through a third party. Sometimes it works well to bring in an outside consultant for the process, particularly if there is no resident information professional or if he/she does not have the time or expertise.
There is another less obvious reason to consider bringing in an outside consultant, and it is actually a credit to the organisation’s information professional. An information audit typically involves surveys and interviews designed to gain an understanding of how stakeholders obtain, share, and use information within the organisation. Engaging a third party to conduct these interviews can improve candour on the part of the responders and therefore enhance reliability of the findings. Some responders do not want to appear critical or unappreciative of the existing library or knowledge management function, particularly if the resident info pro is well=liked. Thus, they hesitate to offer a candid assessment of their situation. Sometimes people find it easier to share their concerns or criticisms with an outsider.
A successful information audit will add value and maximise return on investments while increasing access to organisational knowledge.
- Blog post title: Considerations for an information audit
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- Maximise your return on information investments with an information audit
Tuesday, 12th June 2012
- Information management lessons from "Austin Powers" [ABSTRACT]
Tuesday, 1st March 2011 - SharePoint 2010: Changing the paradigm with a business-oriented approach to records management [ABSTRACT]
Sunday, 4th July 2010 - FUMSI Report Excerpt: Preparing and planning an audit
Sunday, 30th September 2007
Community session
11th December 2024
2025 strategic planning; evaluating research reports; The Financial Times, news and AI
5th November 2024
How are information managers getting involved with AI? Navigating privacy, ethics, and intellectual property
- 2025 strategic planning; evaluating research reports; The Financial Times, news and AI
5th November 2024 - All recent Jinfo Subscription content
31st October 2024 - End-user training best practice research
24th October 2024
- Jinfo Community session (TBC) (Community) 23rd January 2025
- Clinic on contracting for AI (Community) 11th December 2024
- Discussing news and AI strategies with the Financial Times (Community) 21st November 2024