Evaluating information products (step two - design)
Jinfo Article
20th November 2020
Abstract
In this third article in a series of five, we look at what needs to be done to lay the foundations for a successful evaluation process. We look at how to get participants involved and develop criteria for testing and documentation. We focus on a comparative analysis of patent research products conducted by the InfoCenter at Cargill, along with activities and examples of best practice.
Content Access
Does your organisation have a Jinfo Subscription?
Access to Jinfo Content and Community is available through a Jinfo Subscription.
"Yes"
Please sign in to MyJinfo here so that we can check your access to this item:
Or sign in via email:
Enter your email and we'll send you a magic link to sign you in automatically.
"Not yet"
Access to this article is available through a Jinfo Subscription, which will help your organisation:
- Save time and money
- Re-invent information services
- Define, measure and communicate information value.
"Don't know"
Contact us to find out if your organisation already has a Jinfo Subscription.
Or use the 'Text Chat' button at the bottom-right of this page for immediate assistance.
- Article title: Evaluating information products (step two - design)
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- Evaluating information products (step four - outcome and learning points)
Tuesday, 24th November 2020 - Evaluating information products (step three - testing the products)
Monday, 23rd November 2020 - Evaluating information products (step one - scoping and laying the foundation)
Thursday, 19th November 2020 - Evaluating information products (introduction)
Wednesday, 18th November 2020 - How applying Centre of Excellence concepts can help product evaluation
Wednesday, 27th November 2019
- Evaluating information products
Tuesday, 24th November 2020 - Jinfo model - evaluating information products
Wednesday, 24th July 2019