Evaluating information products (step two - design)
Jinfo Article
20th November 2020
Abstract
In this third article in a series of five, we look at what needs to be done to lay the foundations for a successful evaluation process. We look at how to get participants involved and develop criteria for testing and documentation. We focus on a comparative analysis of patent research products conducted by the InfoCenter at Cargill, along with activities and examples of best practice.
Content Access
Access to Jinfo Content and Community is available through a Jinfo Subscription.
Does your organisation have a Jinfo Subscription?
"Yes"
Please sign in to MyJinfo here so that we can check your access to this item:
Or sign in via email:
Enter your email and we'll send you a magic link to sign you in automatically.
"Not yet"
Access to this article is available through a Jinfo Subscription, which will help your organisation:
- Save time and money
- Re-invent information services
- Define, measure and communicate information value.
"Don't know"
Contact us to find out if your organisation already has a Jinfo Subscription.
Or use the 'Text Chat' button at the bottom-right of this page for immediate assistance.
- Article title: Evaluating information products (step two - design)
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- Evaluating information products (step four - outcome and learning points)
Tuesday, 24th November 2020 - Evaluating information products (step three - testing the products)
Monday, 23rd November 2020 - Evaluating information products (step one - scoping and laying the foundation)
Thursday, 19th November 2020 - Evaluating information products (introduction)
Wednesday, 18th November 2020 - How applying Centre of Excellence concepts can help product evaluation
Wednesday, 27th November 2019
- Evaluating information products
Tuesday, 24th November 2020 - Jinfo model - evaluating information products
Wednesday, 24th July 2019