Establishing meaningful usage metrics for benchmarking
Jinfo Article
11th June 2018
Abstract
Usage and adoption metrics are often used by information services and knowledge professionals to measure the success of their service or platforms. However, such metrics may have questionable value when benchmarked against other organisations because the numbers are often not directly comparable and have little meaning outside the context of the organisation they are from. Qualitative comparisons tend to have more value. In this article Steve Bynghall looks at how to get the most value from metrics and improve your information service.
Content Access
Does your organisation have a Jinfo Subscription?
Access to Jinfo Content and Community is available through a Jinfo Subscription.
"Yes"
Please sign in to MyJinfo here so that we can check your access to this item:
Or sign in via email:
Enter your email and we'll send you a magic link to sign you in automatically.
"Not yet"
Access to this article is available through a Jinfo Subscription, which will help your organisation:
- Save time and money
- Re-invent information services
- Define, measure and communicate information value.
"Don't know"
Contact us to find out if your organisation already has a Jinfo Subscription.
Or use the 'Text Chat' button at the bottom-right of this page for immediate assistance.
- Article title: Establishing meaningful usage metrics for benchmarking
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- Benchmarking research reveals successful teams share common practices
Wednesday, 27th September 2017 - The use and limitations of benchmarking data
Thursday, 7th September 2017
- Benchmark information services - optimise your structure
Tuesday, 4th July 2017