Wikipedia Beats Traditional Media at Breaking News?
Jinfo Article
4th January 2013
Abstract
We seem to trust breaking news provided by the 140 characters allowed on Twitter more than the in-depth articles to be found on Wikipedia but should we revise our viewpoint? And should traditional media outlets include more input from amateurs in their reports? Penny Crossland considers crowdsourced news from Twitter and Wikipedia along with research from Brian Keegan, a post-doctoral research fellow in computational science who specialises in information flows of news output on Wikipedia and recently analysed the way that reports on the Connecticut school shooting developed on the site.
Content Access
Does your organisation have a Jinfo Subscription?
Access to Jinfo Content and Community is available through a Jinfo Subscription.
"Yes"
Please sign in to MyJinfo here so that we can check your access to this item:
Or sign in via email:
Enter your email and we'll send you a magic link to sign you in automatically.
"Not yet"
Access to this article is available through a Jinfo Subscription, which will help your organisation:
- Save time and money
- Re-invent information services
- Define, measure and communicate information value.
"Don't know"
Contact us to find out if your organisation already has a Jinfo Subscription.
Or use the 'Text Chat' button at the bottom-right of this page for immediate assistance.
- Article title: Wikipedia Beats Traditional Media at Breaking News?
- Link to this page
- View printable version
Related Blog items:
- Britannica v Wikipedia - which site will you trust?
Sunday, 18th March 2012 - Weather watching via Twitter
Wednesday, 7th March 2012 - Unsocial Twitter hits the big time
Sunday, 30th May 2010 - Twitter – the source for breaking news
Monday, 22nd June 2009