People problems
Jinfo Blog
24th September 2010
Item
With the growth of social networking, people information can have ever wider applications, says a new report. But pursuing information on individuals throws up a whole host of further issues, like deciding who you need to follow, and even whether your pursuit is legal at all. Among all the possible applications, vendor portfolio managers were little involved as yet with those in the âWho knows what?â category, said the Outsell report, Who, What, Where, How? People Information for the Enterprise (purchase details at http://digbig.com/5bckqm). Covering practices such as knowledge sharing, crowdsourcing or expert and professional networks, this certainly looks like an opportunity to seize. But, despite the 35 or so vendors with their various solutions that Outsell profiles, there are wider concerns that infopros will also need to address. Take directed social networks â the ones that, at the simplest end of the scale, list âpeople you may knowâ or tell you that âpeople who bought x also bought yâ. Reporting recently on their own directed network experiment, Michael Brzozowski of Hewlett-Packard Labs and Daniel Romero of Cornell University found for example that having a similarity with someone was actually a relatively poor reason for a social network to recommend you to follow them. They also found that many of the users in their experiment didnât take the decision to follow a new person lightly, even though many current user recommendation interfaces ask users to âblindly followâ new people â and they recommended that injecting an element of randomness could help engage users to keep them coming back (http://digbig.com/5bckqn). Underlying anything to do with people information is privacy. In a recent New York Times article, Kevin OâBrien pointed out that the definition of what constitutes personal information is much broader in Europe than in the United States, and that this is putting the brakes on development of cloud-based applications (http://digbig.com/5bckqp). Speaking at a recent conference on Cloud Computing for the Public Sector (reported on the Public Technology blog), representatives of the United Kingdom Information Commissionerâs Office indicated that there wasnât likely to be any let up on personal privacy any time soon (http://digbig.com/5bckqq). Nowhere in Europe is this more apparent than in Germany, where a recent proposal to limit employersâ use of social networks (see http://www.vivavip.com/go/e30375 for details) has now been followed up by a government suggestion that internet companies could possibly avoid tougher privacy legislation by drawing up their own code of practice by December 7 (http://digbig.com/5bckqr). If dealing with all this is difficult enough when itâs just for you, how much more difficult is it for information professionals trying to do it as a proxy for the decision makers theyâre supporting? The opportunities are there â but so are the challenges.
What's new at Jinfo?
Community session
11th December 2024
2025 strategic planning; evaluating research reports; The Financial Times, news and AI
5th November 2024
How are information managers getting involved with AI? Navigating privacy, ethics, and intellectual property
- 2025 strategic planning; evaluating research reports; The Financial Times, news and AI
5th November 2024 - All recent Jinfo Subscription content
31st October 2024 - End-user training best practice research
24th October 2024
- Jinfo Community session (TBC) (Community) 23rd January 2025
- Clinic on contracting for AI (Community) 11th December 2024
- Discussing news and AI strategies with the Financial Times (Community) 21st November 2024
Learn more about the Jinfo Subscription