Disassociation and library associations
Jinfo Blog
9th March 2012
By James Mullan
Abstract
Most people accept that we live in a fragmented world. Social, political, economic and technological change seems to happen on a regular basis and at times it can be hard to keep up. Within the information profession, change might appear to occur more slowly.
Item
Most people accept that we live in a fragmented world. Social, political, economic and technological change seems to happen on a regular basis and at times it can be hard to keep up. Within the information profession, change might appear to occur more slowly. However, if you look beneath the surface, you'll see information professionals across a number of sectors making significant changes both to the way they work and the services they provide to their users.
One of the key developments in recent years has been the way individuals and groups communicate and collaborate with each other. Tools such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Yammer have made it possible for individuals to create, share and comment on content created by like-minded individuals: individuals who might not work in the same organisation or even sector but are committed to their own personal development, the development of the services they provide and to being a medium to promote and campaign for public libraries. Collaborative tools are also being used to bring together Library graduates and new information professionals who wouldn't otherwise have a space where they could discuss the courses they're considering undertaking and the work they're completing as part of their course.
This leads me nicely onto the subject of this article, which is the number and quality of the multitude of groups that currently represent information professionals in the UK. I'll start by saying that I'm fairly relaxed about the number of societies, organisations, groups and associations representing information professionals in the UK. Even within the sector, I work in the association representing British and Irish Law Librarians (BIALL), which is itself fragmented – with affiliated groups representing Academic Law Librarians, Solo Law Librarians, Irish Law Librarians, Scottish Law Librarians, Law Librarians based in Bristol, Central England, Manchester, the East Midlands and Liverpool, and Law Librarians who work in US Law firms.
These groups have existed for as long as I can remember and will continue to do so as they more accurately represent and promote the interests of individuals working within these specialised areas. They're also able to offer more specialised training to individuals, which BIALL would not be in a position to do given that it offers general training to all of its members. There are also a number of other organisations within the legal sector representing information professionals that are similar to BIALL.
Having a diverse number of groups representing information professionals is, in my mind, no bad thing as it means the opportunity to attend seminars, conferences and networking events that are directly relevant to the work an individual does are increased. There are also more opportunities for individuals to become involved with a group or association.
On a less positive note, having more choice in terms of the number of organisations representing information professionals means that individuals might have to make stark choices when it comes to the organisation with whom they renew their membership. In this regard, having a single association that provides training and represents an individual’s interests effectively, is more appealing then the large number of associations and groups that currently exist.
For an association or group to survive in the current climate, in my mind, it needs to demonstrate that it can successfully offer members true value. If it doesn't do so then, with the number of associations and groups representing information professionals, individuals have a number of different options. Having a choice in this situation is certainly a good thing. But to ensure their continued survival all associations and groups need to give careful consideration to the value they provide, the opportunities there are to become involved with the group and how they market themselves using both traditional and social media tools.
---
This is a short article on a topic addressed in greater detail as a longer FUMSI Article. FUMSI Subscribers can log in to MyShop at FreePint to view the full article. If you are not yet a FUMSI Subscriber, request more information now>>
- Blog post title: Disassociation and library associations
- Link to this page
- View printable version
- The state of the associ-nation
Thursday, 1st March 2012
- Managing information, opportunities and the role of info pros
Thursday, 9th February 2012 - Keeping up with conferences via apps
Monday, 30th January 2012 - Seven things I've learnt about organising a conference
Thursday, 1st December 2011 - "Predux" - How to improve conferences through peer-reviewed rehearsals
Tuesday, 1st November 2011 - Conference Information: Managing Before, During and After [ABSTRACT]
Monday, 7th December 2009
Discussing news and AI strategies with the Financial Times
Community session
21st November 2024
2025 strategic planning; evaluating research reports; The Financial Times, news and AI
Blog posting
5th November 2024
November 2024 Update
YouTube video
7th November 2024
- 2025 strategic planning; evaluating research reports; The Financial Times, news and AI
5th November 2024 - All recent Jinfo Subscription content
31st October 2024 - End-user training best practice research
24th October 2024
- Jinfo Community session (TBC) (Community) 12th December 2024
- Discussing news and AI strategies with the Financial Times (Community) 21st November 2024
- Asia-Pacific Community session (Community) 19th November 2024